Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:02:20 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.org, Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> Subject: Re: Changes to suser() and friends Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011102170025.21159M-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111021252001.47458-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just FYI, it looks like a number of other platforms also use struct ucred * as their primary suser() argument, including OpenBSD. Shared drivers appear to tend to have __FreeBSD__ ifdef's scattered around as a result. Also an FYI, we have countless places where a struct td * isn't passed down, and suser() currently relies on curproc. Once we have td->td_ucred ready, we'll need to fix all those, and more universally pass around the td of choice. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011102170025.21159M-100000>