Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:05:03 -0700 From: Ben Mesander <ben@timing.com> To: Ben Mesander <ben@timing.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: _REENTRANT in math.h & libm oddities. Message-ID: <15920.26383.567651.566335@piglet.timing.com> In-Reply-To: <15920.25508.766136.494182@piglet.timing.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10301231601440.12720-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <200301232122.h0NLM31e003077@harmony.village.org> <15920.25508.766136.494182@piglet.timing.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ben Mesander writes: > But even so, I disagree that the _r function definitions should only > appear in math.h if _REENTRANT is defined. That is, I disagree unless > the POSIX specification says otherwise; I've been surprised by it > before. I was unaware that POSIX mentioned _REENTRANT. The folks on freebsd-standards said that the defns for the threadsafe gamma funcs should be in the BSD namespace (__BSD_VISIBLE). Regards, Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15920.26383.567651.566335>