Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 05:13:24 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: julian@ref.tfs.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDvs Lxxxxx Flame.. Message-ID: <199601171313.FAA00438@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 1996 13:33:34 %2B0100." <199601171233.NAA13776@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> Luigi Rizzo said: > > Someone should respond and state that freebsd, netbsd and bsdi are > > widely available and in the case of bsdi that is a commercial > > product for those who like that sort of things. Additionally, > > I consider them all to be stable platforms. > > > > Cheers, > > Amancio > > I considered writing a letter, but being involved in a flame war > on a newpaper is like playing chess over mail. You get to retirement > before the game is over... The problem is that if we let things like that letter go by in a major magazine then people WILL believe that the *only* unix alternative for Intel platforms is FreeBSD --- excuse me Linux 8) Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601171313.FAA00438>