Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:35:29 +0100 From: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spammers Message-ID: <20030511143529.GA1389@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030510144437.D5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509201306.GA22910@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509203926.GA17604@mail.karamazov.org> <20030510144437.D5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 May 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > Anything that you can visually identify and decode with minimal effort, > spammers can (and probably already have) as well. For instance, "foo at > bar dot com" is well known to be totally useless. It would help if people > who want to contribute to this thread did some research first. :) > > One thing that does seem to work for personal web pages is to put your > email address in a graphic. That at least raises the bar quite a bit. > Sadly, it raises the bar above lynx users too. I for one don't want to have to go into X just to be able to find what e-mail address to report a bug to :) -- David Taylor davidt@yadt.co.uk "The future just ain't what it used to be"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030511143529.GA1389>