Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:43:29 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh <arved@freebsd.org> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: Tilman Linneweh <arved@freebsd.org>, d@delphij.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> Subject: Re: Why no MovableType port? Message-ID: <12F689E4-C1AF-4072-AD4A-CB8AFF16BF75@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <op.ubkh84xn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <55753317-897A-41B7-A4C9-789062739830@goldmark.org> <4835B4DF.30208@delphij.net> <op.ubkh84xn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 22, 2008, at 20:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> www/MT > > Interesting.. Wondering why not rename it as www/movabletype? A lot > of people have no idea what 'MT' is and the 'movabletype' will get > hit in search engine a lot faster. Well, "make search key="movabletype"" finds the port, and it has been named "MT" since 5 years. I maintain it since 4 years, and this is the first time someone complained. MT is the short name used all over the website (like "MT Day", "MT Beta", "MT professionals", "MT community", "Styles for MT ported from WordPress" etc.). So So i am not yet convinced we gain much by renaming it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12F689E4-C1AF-4072-AD4A-CB8AFF16BF75>