Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:46:08 +0800
From:      Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: htt & smp
Message-ID:  <20041109084608.GA3864@frontfree.net>
In-Reply-To: <16784.25080.724865.791932@ran.psg.com>
References:  <16784.25080.724865.791932@ran.psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:21:44PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> for a server running a bunch of net aps, if the cpu is htt,
> is it worth turning on smp?

It depends.  Generally speaking, if you run "a bunch" of net apps,
HTT should be beneficial for response time, however, it will hinder
those applications that don't utilize threading and is CPU intensive.

A ``systat -vm'' can give you some useful information what your
application is like.  If applications needs to sleep and wait for
I/O, then turning on HTT may result in better performance.=20

Cheers,
--=20
Xin LI <delphij frontfree net>	http://www.delphij.net/
See complete headers for GPG key and other information.


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBkIPQ/cVsHxFZiIoRAtNpAJ9fzhX+IMphP8iLc2fA9ddt/l9aeACfbRUL
v3wdRwa0FnNeXSiFrLANyfI=
=VuI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041109084608.GA3864>