Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 20:07:58 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net> To: Tilman Linneweh <arved@freebsd.org> Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, d@delphij.net, Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why no MovableType port? Message-ID: <20080523000757.GA3959@shepherd> In-Reply-To: <12F689E4-C1AF-4072-AD4A-CB8AFF16BF75@freebsd.org> References: <55753317-897A-41B7-A4C9-789062739830@goldmark.org> <4835B4DF.30208@delphij.net> <op.ubkh84xn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <12F689E4-C1AF-4072-AD4A-CB8AFF16BF75@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tilman Linneweh <arved@freebsd.org> [05-23-2008]: > On May 22, 2008, at 20:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> >>> www/MT >> >> Interesting.. Wondering why not rename it as www/movabletype? A lot of >> people have no idea what 'MT' is and the 'movabletype' will get hit in >> search engine a lot faster. > > Well, "make search key="movabletype"" finds the port, and it has been named > "MT" since 5 years. I maintain it since 4 years, and this is the first time > someone complained. MT is the short name used all over the website (like > "MT Day", "MT Beta", "MT professionals", "MT community", "Styles for MT > ported from WordPress" etc.). So > > So i am not yet convinced we gain much by renaming > it. Agreed. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080523000757.GA3959>