Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:43:26 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: fake fake <four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template Message-ID: <20120512174326.62b4594f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BrxiGDFQkMPk3NoW2OshvdOaZaKFsPM%2B7oCH0p3NzOkTuqxcA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BrxiGAGsZMh9sDQ8z4ZXBiMvYgXPdoUqZYLHrQoU5wW7HVEGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHu1Y73pSopNpcdMGX3b0Z=hoLwAfCKmON_irQUrRgjWzT%2BDBA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BrxiGDFQkMPk3NoW2OshvdOaZaKFsPM%2B7oCH0p3NzOkTuqxcA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 May 2012 00:15:54 +0900, fake fake wrote: > Thanks. But I need specific directory only. > umask way seems to set mode not only under ~/secret but other > directories like ~/public. You're sure you want to have something _public_ in your home directory? > Is there any elegant way? Depends on how the files are created. A possibility is to set umask prior to creating files, and resetting it to its previous value when being done. If files are created automatically, this could be done by a shell script. Such a script could also be used to "copy to secure directory", performing the cp and the chmod step. However, is there any problem _for your particular case_ that setting secret/ to rwx/-/- only, and leaving the files inside with the default umask rw/r/r? Maybe there really is a more elegant way. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120512174326.62b4594f.freebsd>