Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:55:57 +0100
From:      Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Any interest in keeping Boinc & SETI alive.
Message-ID:  <CAJ_iqtYSkmMEAGQeXMsq8PWLBevBF_omZo91N-PgUZCZcZomQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56D1A269.5090607@gwdg.de>
References:  <BY2PR14MB0710C0D5EB257A3A302DB6A2FFB80@BY2PR14MB0710.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <56D1A269.5090607@gwdg.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wrote:
> Am 27.02.16 um 13:27 schrieb Ron Von:
>> HI all, I was wondering if there was any interest in keeping the BOINC ports alive? SETI is now at version 8, and thus version 7 is useless now.  I don't have porting and compiling skills yet, so otherwise I would try my hand at it.
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> Thanks for asking.
>
> I am one of the guys, who uses BOINC not only for SETI, but also for
> lhcathomeclassic, milkiway, and einstein. So yes, there is an interest
> in keeping these ports alive.
>

I also use it, for setiathome, milkyway and whatever other projects I
can convince to run on my (oldish) BOINC machine.
setiathome v8 was discussed not long ago:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2016-February/101793.html

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ_iqtYSkmMEAGQeXMsq8PWLBevBF_omZo91N-PgUZCZcZomQg>