Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:56:30 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <arch@freebsd.org> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: /rescue Message-ID: <20030508165630.GA55207@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030508.094206.68986125.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20030508.094206.68986125.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:42:06AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Yep, .PATH does simplify things. Revised diff > attached. Thanks for the suggestion. It was mostly decided to use /stand rather than /rescue as sticking with FreeBSD's 10 year precidence is better than going with NetBSD's <1 yr one. It was also felt this patch puts way too much into /stand -- like vi (rather than edit) and dhclient for instance. /stand should be just enough to recover a system by a *skilled* person. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030508165630.GA55207>