Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:16:42 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld not using proper build environment Message-ID: <20050821071640.GB85488@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <20050821042032.3AD765D08@ptavv.es.net> References: <20050821042032.3AD765D08@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:20:32PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I'm not a make(1) expert, but something appears wrong with Makefile.inc1 > and the build environment it provides for buildworld. > > There has been a short thread on this with the subject: > Unable to build libedit > > It turns out that buildworld is using the header files in /usr/include > and not those in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include when compiling. I've > looked at Makefile.inc1 and it looks like the proper environment is > made for AMD64, but perhaps not for other platforms (like i386). I'm not > sure what is wrong, but I have confirmed that buildworld is using > /usr/include/histedit.h in lieu of the new version in $WORLDTMP. > > Am I wrong about all of this this or is something wrong with the > buildworld. I think the problem is that the files in lib/libedit include histedit.h with "" instead of <>. This works for NetBSD because they have histedit.h in the same directory. -I. should be dropped from CFLAGS probably too. I once noticed a problem that #include <term.h> picks up the local term.h instead of the one in [..]/tmp/usr/include. Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050821071640.GB85488>