Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:34:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: man pages Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103161434140.773-100000@zeppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010316143118.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sure! Great! But put 'em in! > > On 16-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Actually, I think you only need disable_intr && restore_intr, which should be > > paired over tight MD code sections, and yes, leaving it ambigious is > > desirable > > IMO. > > Actually, the cy(4) driver uses explicit enable_intr()'s as does some of the > 386 fpu code, and the pre-spinlock variant of the sio(4) driver also used > explicit enable_intr(). I'm not a big fan out of it myself, but some things do > need it. The manpages look good though I'd be inclined personally to collapse > them into a single intr.9 manpage. Also, the actual functions are declared > in <machine/cpufunc.h>, and I didn't write these, I am just tweaking them. :) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0103161434140.773-100000>