Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 17:08:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Barb problem, FOUND Message-ID: <199703170008.RAA03992@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:19:47 MST." <199703162219.PAA06467@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199703162219.PAA06467@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199703162219.PAA06467@phaeton.artisoft.com> Terry Lambert writes: : OK, then I don't know why it's bitching. It's perfectly valid to have : a virtual destructor inline: the STL library book does it, so it's an : OK thing to do. It is a valid C++ construct, but it is not always handled well by C++ compilers. That's why it is bitching. Generally, virtual inlines are a bad idea for the reasons that I've already gone into. : Personally, I think it's a compiler bug. It is. Quanitifying it is the hard part. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703170008.RAA03992>