Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:20:04 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_GCC flag disables installation of /usr/bin/cpp too -- is it Ok? Message-ID: <1997790603.20110907212004@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E67A720.2000903@FreeBSD.org> References: <1231707981.20110907201053@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4E67A720.2000903@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Dimitry. You wrote 7 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 21:17:20: >> I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added >> WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is >> documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it >> affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And I need cpp for some config processing. >> Is it bug in documentation (man src.conf) or build system? I know >> about WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, and it seems reasonable, that >> WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN disables cpp too, but not WITHOUT_GCC :(. > It's a bug in the documentation. WITHOUT_GCC actually disables at IMHO, it is bug in build process ;-) -- see below > least the following executables: > /usr/bin/c++ > /usr/bin/c++filt > /usr/bin/CC > /usr/bin/cc > /usr/bin/cpp > /usr/bin/g++ > /usr/bin/gcc > /usr/bin/gcov > /usr/libexec/cc1 > /usr/libexec/cc1plus I think, that /usr/bin/cpp is valuable by itself, as it is handy generic preprocessor tool, useful for preparing complex ipfw scripts, for example. All others are bundled together, for sure. I think, it is good idea to exclude cpp from this list (but not from WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, of course). --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1997790603.20110907212004>