Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:43:03 -0700
From:      Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r268624 - head/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb
Message-ID:  <53C424B7.7070403@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140714175345.GK93733@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <201407141742.s6EHgMNt094168@svn.freebsd.org> <20140714175345.GK93733@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 07/14/14 10:53, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0000, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> Author: nwhitehorn
>> Date: Mon Jul 14 17:42:22 2014
>> New Revision: 268624
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268624
>>
>> Log:
>>    On my Lenovo laptop, the firmware maps the EFI framebuffer with MTRRs set
>>    to uncacheable. This leads to execrable console performance. Once PMAP is
>>    up, remap the framebuffer as write-combining. This reduces boot time on my
>>    laptop by 60% when booting with EFI.
>>    
>>    MFC after:	2 weeks
>>
>> Modified:
>>    head/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c
>>
>> Modified: head/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c	Mon Jul 14 17:16:09 2014	(r268623)
>> +++ head/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c	Mon Jul 14 17:42:22 2014	(r268624)
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>>   
>>   static vd_init_t vt_efifb_init;
>>   static vd_probe_t vt_efifb_probe;
>> +static void vt_efifb_remap(void *efifb_data);
>>   
>>   static struct vt_driver vt_efifb_driver = {
>>   	.vd_name = "efifb",
>> @@ -68,6 +69,8 @@ static struct vt_driver vt_efifb_driver
>>   static struct fb_info local_info;
>>   VT_DRIVER_DECLARE(vt_efifb, vt_efifb_driver);
>>   
>> +SYSINIT(efifb_remap, SI_SUB_KMEM, SI_ORDER_ANY, vt_efifb_remap, &local_info);
>> +
>>   static int
>>   vt_efifb_probe(struct vt_device *vd)
>>   {
>> @@ -133,9 +136,9 @@ vt_efifb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
>>   	info->fb_size = info->fb_height * info->fb_stride;
>>   	info->fb_pbase = efifb->fb_addr;
>>   	/*
>> -	 * We could use pmap_mapdev here except that the kernel pmap
>> -	 * hasn't been created yet and hence any attempt to lock it will
>> -	 * fail.
>> +	 * Use the direct map as a crutch until pmap is available. Once pmap
>> +	 * is online, the framebuffer will be remapped by vt_efifb_remap()
>> +	 * using pmap_mapdev_attr().
>>   	 */
>>   	info->fb_vbase = PHYS_TO_DMAP(efifb->fb_addr);
>>   
>> @@ -163,3 +166,22 @@ vt_efifb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
>>   
>>   	return (CN_INTERNAL);
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void
>> +vt_efifb_remap(void *xinfo)
>> +{
>> +	struct fb_info *info = xinfo;
>> +
>> +	if (info->fb_pbase == 0)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Remap as write-combining. This massively improves performance and
>> +	 * happens very early in kernel initialization, when everything is
>> +	 * still single-threaded and interrupts are off, so replacing the
>> +	 * mapping address is safe.
>> +	 */
>> +	info->fb_vbase = (intptr_t)pmap_mapdev_attr(info->fb_pbase,
>> +	    info->fb_size, VM_MEMATTR_WRITE_COMBINING);
>> +}
>> +
> Could you use pmap_change_attr() ? This would save some KVA.

Does that work with the direct map? I'm pretty hesitant to muck with the 
direct map region this way...
-Nathan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C424B7.7070403>