Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Jul 1996 08:46:26 -0700
From:      "M.R.Murphy" <mrm@MARMOT.Mole.ORG>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, sextonr.crestvie@squared.com
Subject:   Re: Kernel Config (Was: GENERIC Kernel Debate)
Message-ID:  <199607111546.IAA04439@meerkat.mole.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 	I think we all ultimately want the all-singing, all-dancing loadable 
> kernel modules with PnP detection and auto config of devices while 
> simultaneously selecting proper drivers for compatible hardware while 
> working around all known incompatibilites. 

Not all of us do. At least one of us wants a really fast, really reliable
system that makes extremely efficient use of its hardware environment. I
suspect that that's not quite compatible with all-singing, all-dancing.
Maybe, but I'm sceptical.

I wouldn't be horribly unhappy with a SunOS 4.x-like system
configuration procedure, but after once again getting used to a
full-source configuration procedure, I think I'd miss the flexibility
even more than the last time I had to live with SCO, ISC, or AT&T.

--
Mike Murphy  mrm@Mole.ORG  +1 619 598 5874
Better is the enemy of Good



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607111546.IAA04439>