Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:03:39 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: John Beukema <john@gateway.net.hk> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Yet another PPP question Message-ID: <199601171603.JAA08218@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960117220633.9082A-100000@gateway.net.hk> References: <199601170511.WAA07206@rocky.sri.MT.net> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960117220633.9082A-100000@gateway.net.hk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is not this CHAP and PAP which are pretty standard even if not in the RFC? > I think it is hard to pretend MS is not there. Nope, CHAP and PAP are supported by both versions of PPP in FreeBSD. nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601171603.JAA08218>