Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:57:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r395628 - in head/www: . py-pyocclient Message-ID: <20150831055703.GA44646@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55E3E915.7060300@FreeBSD.org> References: <201508301655.t7UGtEVx037588@repo.freebsd.org> <55E3CED6.3010703@FreeBSD.org> <CAFU734xKRBuFNQTKvb59v0eK4qmzFHwZiWWUBqahG5G5SJXyXw@mail.gmail.com> <55E3E915.7060300@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 03:41:41PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 31/08/2015 3:26 PM, Thomas Zander wrote: > > On 31 August 2015 at 05:49, Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Given this port only supports 2.x, this should be set to python:-2.7, > >> unless it doesn't support 2.6 in which case it should be set to python:2.7 > > > > True, but somehow it feels wrong to set python:-2.7 if you mean "pre-3.x". > > Ports should be declarative rather than imperative in respect to > describing what Python versions are supported. > > I'm not 100% sure whether USES=python supports the a.b,a.c format (I > don't think it does), but if not, the closest thing we have to > stipulating "< a.d" is "-a.c". If "port only supports 2.x" what's more declaratively clear than python:2? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150831055703.GA44646>