Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Nov 1999 16:49:39 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A call to squease more bytes from `boot2'
Message-ID:  <19991113164939.F90421@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911131622530.4199-100000@hub.freebsd.org>; from kris@hub.freebsd.org on Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 04:23:42PM -0800
References:  <19991113152838.A16659@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911131622530.4199-100000@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 04:23:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Do you have any idea why the new compiler is generating so much more code
> than the old? 

Nope.  I can post the "-S" output if you like.  But the EGCS vs. GCC
versions are quite different.  There were many changes to the back end
between the EGCS 1.1 and GCC 2.95 branches.


> Have any new optimizations been activated by default which could just
> be deactivated?

I've added a few optimizations to CFLAGS and that helped some, but not
enough.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991113164939.F90421>