Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 03:20:37 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jhs@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, n1epo4tl@ibmmail.com, n1epo4tl@ibmmail.com Subject: Re: satan Message-ID: <199605141020.DAA12405@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199605121245.OAA24573@vector.jhs.no_domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* As memory serves, there is a port but `soemeone in charge' ;-) * declined to import what was offered (on philosophical rather than technical * grounds, ... this was maybe 6 months ago). The satan port was uploaded to wcarchive's incoming and had disappeared before the porter sent mail asking "why didn't my port get in?" a few weeks later. I never heard back from the porter since. As far as I know, there has never been any philosophical discussion about whether the port is suitable or not. At least not in -ports (I don't read all the lists), which is the only place to have an "official" discussion of that sort. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605141020.DAA12405>