Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:24:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world shortcut (was Re: Snapshots) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907191023160.55477-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com> In-Reply-To: <199907191419.HAA15075@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: : In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907191007590.55417-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>, : Matt Behrens writes: : > On 19 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: : > : 'make depend && make && make install' is much faster and works fine : > : for small incremental updates. : > Hmm, how do we know when it's not working fine? After the system : > breaks? :-) : That's why the &&'s are there. && only allows subsequent commands to : execute if the previous command returned with an exit status of 0. I guess my question was less of that and more of "can we be assured we will have a working system even if the entire process returns no error codes"? Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Owner/Administrator, zigg.com Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907191023160.55477-100000>