Date: 11 Jan 2001 10:23:01 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed chage to sbuf semantics. Message-ID: <xzpg0iq30ju.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "11 Jan 2001 10:08:56 %2B0100" References: <200101110436.f0B4a5T00319@caspian.scsiguy.com> <xzpk882317b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > If the user really wants to finalize an overflowed sbuf, they can > explicitly un-overflow it using setpos() (this is documented in the > NOTES section of the man page). Please to not change the behavior of > sbuf_finish(). Actually, there's one alternative: provide a flag (settable at sbuf_new() time) that tells sbuf_finish() to ignore overflows. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0iq30ju.fsf>