Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:20 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: must /compat/linux stay in root-fs? Message-ID: <20100110112520.92c1de3c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de> References: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:21:02 +0100, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > Can I safely move the /compat tu /usr/local/compat and do a symlink to > let point /compat --> /usr/local/compat or is there some reason that > linux-f10 ports put all into /compat in root-fs? I don't see any problem to do so. On my 7 default install, there's /compat@ -> usr/compat, and /usr lives on a separate partition. As long as the symlink is present, it should not be a problem. I see that you're suggestion /usr/local/compat instead of the default /usr/compat - maybe it's worth providing an additional symlink compat@ -> local/compat from within /usr? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100110112520.92c1de3c.freebsd>