Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:01:57 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fdalloc optimization Message-ID: <20050823110157.GA98581@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <86hddhvsc2.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050821084546.GA77111@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050821175406.GA36164@xor.obsecurity.org> <868xyu3wln.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050822161339.GA13907@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050823102623.GA97332@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <86hddhvsc2.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:51:57PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> writes: > > here is my analyze of the problem - if its correct then the patch > > speeds it up > > I agree in theory, but I'll bet you a beer that you can't measure the > improvement. thats highly possible... but if the patch is correct it should be used cause its improvement (althought not measurable)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050823110157.GA98581>