Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:48:14 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP vs mpd (was: FreeBSD lacks PPPoE (pppoa3 solution)) Message-ID: <20030712054814.GA58001@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030711044602.58539.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030711044602.58539.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:46:02AM +0100, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hi; >=20 > I wanted to bring this up a little later but since there is a somewhat re= lated > thread I thought I might as well bring this now. Our default PPPd is extr= emely > outdated. The version in the distribution is a patched-up version of Paul= 's PPP > 2.3.5 which is maintained now at http://dp.samba.org/ppp/. Version 2.3.5 = is > obsoleted and the latest version doesn't support *BSD. The main problem involved in updating it has merging the FreeBSD changes into the significantly different pppd code. If the Debian people have done this, then it could be updated - you didn't post a link to the patches though. Kris --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/D6EeWry0BWjoQKURArdLAKDq7cRw2P9hN7RX6V4jRgv93Ej/1QCeIQHj Gr/DPep7RQGgpWvB4hq42tw= =Ccqf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030712054814.GA58001>