Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:56:51 -0700
From:      Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [CFT] New dialog for ports
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1s2jE5ANE9P1Zn_QMJu3K2z4hF9HCoBf_oL=eXDH52qCw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130320141244.GP67352@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20130314095529.GH53963@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51492152.2010709@FreeBSD.org> <20130320070957.GK67352@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <3b3e70c0c550b64c4f295e0479d0e681.squirrel@mouf.net> <20130320141244.GP67352@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:07:15AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>> >
>> > I wonder if it is worth to let the question to install dialog4ports.
>> >
>> > I mean dialog4ports being mandatory you should just be installed directly
>> > doesn't it?
>> >
>> > anyone have an opinion about this?
>> >
>> > I will remove the question on 27/03 if I got more please do than please
>> > don't at
>> > that time.
>>
>> The question does lead one to think it's optional. If it's not optional,
>> then there shouldn't be a prompt. I think it should be optional. IMHO, the
>> requirement being mandator violates POLA, as does the prompt. These are
>> questions that should have been answered before it was committed.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>
> Why would dialog4ports be optional, the dialog(1) from base isn't able to
> reflect what the new option framwork does, keeping it and both code to have
> both, looks like a non sense to me.

bapt,

I think you may be missing the point. It's not whether dialog4ports
should be default, it's whether you should be ASKED if you want to
install it. It's now a dependency of the ports system and, like other
dependencies, should just be installed without asking questions.

I suspect that, for the most part, you are in violent agreement with
those asking THE QUERY, not dialog4ports, to be removed.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1s2jE5ANE9P1Zn_QMJu3K2z4hF9HCoBf_oL=eXDH52qCw>