Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:20:58 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:15:40PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > 6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my > > webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc > > locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be > > promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to > > encourage people to consider upgrading. >=20 > Sorry, I was very imprecise - I meant 6.2 vs 7-current+patches from that > benchmark. I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc locking in CVS. Kris --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF4e+qWry0BWjoQKURArIqAJ95ta5hcrFWNT3l036QjwspLi4KzgCgjP4v 7J5SEOnfQaKQpUOinNVlN68= =Etdo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225202058.GA77835>