Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:14:00 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r40970 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook Message-ID: <511D0D48.1090000@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmY2s79rTi8=2uOif2Oq3r0mN1bAZE2JSgV51tKwmFgjA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302141435.r1EEZsXu042558@svn.freebsd.org> <511CF790.7040804@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgmY2s79rTi8=2uOif2Oq3r0mN1bAZE2JSgV51tKwmFgjA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eitan Adler ha scritto: > Because a program that uses pthreads *must* use -pthread to both > compile and link and not use -lpthread. Is this the reason we have the following in bsd.port.mk? :-) PTHREAD_CFLAGS?= We are not talking about correct programming standards, we are talking about porting software on FreeBSD. Do we really want port maintainers to do extra work for 'purity'? > That it happens to work is an > implementation detail not be relied upon. It's a *fundamental* implementation detail that I don't think anyone is going to break. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?511D0D48.1090000>