Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:55:40 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Kurt Jaeger <lists@c0mplx.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <21414.1377258940@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes: >> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; >> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; > >I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with >gcc in ports, that is. +1 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21414.1377258940>