Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 07:57:35 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ? Message-ID: <48609D4C-44A7-45BB-8179-692185E8F80F@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4EDE259B.4010502@digsys.bg> References: <20111205192703.GA49118@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <2D87D847-A2B7-4E77-B6C1-61D73C9F582F@digsys.bg> <20111205222834.GA50285@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4EDDF9F4.9070508@digsys.bg> <4EDE259B.4010502@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/12/2011, at 24:54, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > It seems performance measurements are more dependent on the server = (nuttcp -S) machine. > We will have to rule out the interrupt storms first of course, any = advice? You can control the storm threshold by setting the = hw.intr_storm_threshold sysctl. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48609D4C-44A7-45BB-8179-692185E8F80F>