Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:02:23 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: rotkap@gmx.de Cc: rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What the hell is going on with mplayer? Message-ID: <20060715030223.0e706160@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <lp9io3-qqu1.ln1@news.t-online.com> References: <r2uho3-f5i1.ln1@news.t-online.com> <20060713163515.j8xgi8e8kkoswww8@netchild.homeip.net> <lp9io3-qqu1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_rcRRD+hzqHxJ2/VoctBfwNd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:43:01 +0200 Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> wrote: > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: >=20 > > Quoting Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> (from Thu, 13 Jul > > 2006 15:23:07 +0200): > > > >> I just wanted to so a simple =BBportupgrade mplayer-gtk=AB, and see wh= at > >> habens: > >> > >> > >> ** Detected a package name change: mplayer-gtk (multimedia/mplayer) > >> -> 'mplayer-gtk2-esound' (multimedia/mplayer) > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> What a surprise, name change. Not mentioned in UPD= ATING > > > > Does it needs to be mentioned? portupgrade is able to handle it > > without *special* instructions in UPDATING. >=20 > Well, okay. this is not necessary. >=20 > But all the new kobs (specially the new defaults!) should be > mentioned.=20 [ ... ] > All the stuff is configurable with "make config". But how should > someone know, that this is specially this time necessary. I 've > mplayer installed, a long time ago. All portupgrades were trouble-free, > since now. >=20 > It COULD be trouble-free, if any information about the new knobs will > be transfered to the users (e.g. in UPDATING). >=20 > A Tip that it is better to run "make config", would be enough. Maybe. The new version of the port was posted for testing here a since a few weeks back. I believe it received 2 or 3 feedback emails (one of which mine). The PR stayed in the queue more that a week. I received exactly one feedback email (from a fellow commiter fixing mostly a few style things). Maybe the maintainer got more feedback on private. I will check the OPTIONS handling and commit the needed fixes, thanks for reporting. This being said, the tone of your emails could be better. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #323: Your processor has processed too many instructions. Turn it off immediately, do not type any commands!! --Sig_rcRRD+hzqHxJ2/VoctBfwNd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEuDCWBX6fi0k6KXsRAlyfAJ9tjTcxhy16dMPpgxqxfpgcVJjNuwCdEXgF zKGfGS1l+1Ylr6IIa6cydfc= =GYgl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_rcRRD+hzqHxJ2/VoctBfwNd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060715030223.0e706160>