Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:41:24 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: mux@sneakerz.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal for a new mount API Message-ID: <20020118114124.61c39faf.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <12159.1011371137@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20020118112224.236b4754.ak03@gte.com> <12159.1011371137@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I belive what you see is the backwards compatibility stuff. How is that? The vfs_nmount sycall accepts flags as its first parameter and then proceeds testing it for flags various MNT_??? bits almost exactly as the existing mount sysccall is doing today. What is the point in backwards compatibility for these functions anyway? The new mount was supposed to become a new syscall, if I am not mistaken. -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118114124.61c39faf.ak03>