Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:03:34 +0100 (CET)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To:        ru@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bin/34159: chroot man page-implementation mismatch
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.44.0201231801561.32692-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <200201221049.g0MAnk605703@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 ru@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: chroot man page-implementation mismatch
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: ru
> State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 22 02:47:32 PST 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> The misleading comment was removed.  The old BSD code really
> had the "setuid(getuid())" line at some point.

Thanks, but you only addressed one of the three suggestions I made;
would you mind re-opening the PR and/or making the following two
further changes?

  o If chroot indeed can only be run by the super-user, this should
    be properly documented, for example:

    "This command can be run only by the super-user."

  o "exec's command" should most probably read "exec's command relative
    to newroot".

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0201231801561.32692-100000>