Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 01:02:47 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise Message-ID: <1036483457.20110908010247@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wQ1iZ-GyR8=T0C2tEKYWvR3fMpY0y3oSWi1QjP9qHhRXA@mail.gmail.com> References: <1505890415.20110908005042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAGH67wQ1iZ-GyR8=T0C2tEKYWvR3fMpY0y3oSWi1QjP9qHhRXA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Garrett. You wrote 8 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 0:55:11: > It needs to be changed to NFSCL: > $ svngrep -r NFSCL /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client > options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCL Yep, I found it in seconds, but after that kernel + nanobsd image rebuild takes considerable amount of time. > I think the nomenclature change was done s.t. clients using old NFS > implementations didn't require any changes in their KERNCONF files. It is not true. I'm using old KERNCONF (with only NFSCLIENT) and old fstab (Without any NSF vversion options) -- and got error on boot due to unmountable file system! Of course, if this system had had full set of modules, this situation would have masked by transparent loading of nfscl.ko. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1036483457.20110908010247>