Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:24:16 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 Message-ID: <20050316202334.W20708@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <200503170222.07169@harrymail> References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050315085943.A20708@mail.chesapeake.net> <4237CF47.1010806@FreeBSD.org> <200503170222.07169@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 16. M=E4rz 2005 07:16 schrieb Sergey Matveychuk: > > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > >>just ffs: 1:47 min > > >>nullfs: 1:43 min (oops!:) > > >>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min > > >> > > >>Almost ten times degradation. > > > > > > Can you try this again on current? I just committed some changes to > > > nullfs which vastly simplify the locking. I don't see anything inher= ent > > > in the code that should cause such a slowdown. > > > > The problem has gone. Thanks Jeff! > > Don't forget MFC it some time :) > > Highly appreciated for 5.4!!! I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture to properly function. I'll mail re@ to see what their opinion is for 5.5. > > Thanks a lot, > > -Harry >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050316202334.W20708>