Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 19:24:27 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MBONE volunteers? Message-ID: <199606010224.TAA04772@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 31 May 1996 22:15:11 EDT." <199606010215.WAA01940@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
gsm is 13.7 kilobits/second;however with the protocol overhead in rtp it should be more like 30 kilobits/sec Amancio >From The Desk Of "Louis A. Mamakos" : > This sounds reasonable to me. I also like the change of the audio > coding, which will hopefully make it much more accessable. GSM is > about 9.6 kb/s, right? > > louie > > > > From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> > > > Subject: Re: MBONE volunteers? > > > > > > How about if the FreeBSD Lounge used 3 different multicast groups, one > > > for each media type? While I can reasonably subscribe to the wb group > > > and expect it to mostly work on my 56k connection, any kind of audio > > > or video usually blows it. Now, if you ask for one media type, you > > > get all three because they share the same group. > > > > > > > I suppose I could set it up this way. I didn't want to get too piggy on > > the multicast addresses, but it makes sense to do this. I guess I > > should also change the default audio encoding to be gsm rather than dvi2. > > This might help somewhat. > > > > I will change it to this: > > Format Proto Addr Port TTL Vars > > Audio: gsm rtp 224.2.100.100 16400 127 id:0 > > WB: wb udp 224.2.100.101 32800 127 orient:portrait > > Video: h261 rtp 224.2.100.102 49200 127 id:0 > > > > Does that seem reasonable? > > > > -Jim > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606010224.TAA04772>