Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:59:38 +0100 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? Message-ID: <op.tonvhock8527sy@guido.klop.ws> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, [cut some text] > So here come my questions: > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I > use cvsup? > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my > source? > > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with the > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. Read this. It tells you why portsnap is invented. And why cvsup/csup is still better for other things then ports. http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tonvhock8527sy>