Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:52:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906301748430.46476-100000@unix1.digital-web.net> In-Reply-To: <12067.930774859@verdi.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > It was Livingston who first screwed everone by just starting to use > > 1645/1646 without any official assignment, well, that was okay for > > a while, but everyone should now migrate to the official numbers as > > fast as they can _YOU_ included. > > Unfortunately, I have seen no sign whatsoever that the industry *is* > moving in the direction of 1812/1813. If the majority of the industry > uses 1645/1646, that is what FreeBSD should also use to interoperate. If I recall correctly the Livingston (now actually Lucent) PM3's default to 1812/1813. I remember finding that out the hard way one afternoon. I believe the latest version of Livingson's radius has a command line arg to specify which port to run on. I eventually figured it out after an hour or so. There is no perfect answer here, however it sounds like some comments in the services about this would be a good idea :-) > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no Joseph Scott joseph@randomnetworks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906301748430.46476-100000>