Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:47:25 -0800 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Tanel Rebane <tanel@rebane.se> Subject: Re: What is the relationship between Intel and FreeBSD in regards to igb(4)? Message-ID: <CAFOYbcm2Aqo=ZmXpydQq4U3G32RAZxDMDqDQtJT-kQBAyvhwkg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbcksvcxagvBh-kFa8j=pPiWL3LGZVMK_4FcPF3v3s%2BvAdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANdUpHODYuGCFUSLuLTObgPMmb6FXAQPYXkHi0JiTDPSpNb3%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1ud8D6gpRyXEaxhuf%2BfeYRsQjtkXMsE_bsbSmhhpT5BsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFOYbcksvcxagvBh-kFa8j=pPiWL3LGZVMK_4FcPF3v3s%2BvAdQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OH, and a bit further comment... I maintain all the Intel based 1 and 10G drivers, which means dev/e1000 and dev/ixgbe. ALL Intel released devices right up to the present are supported in these drivers as of the source in HEAD. Of course we (Intel) are always working on new hardware, and thus I am usually in development on new stuff at any given time as well, but I have been kept code as up to date as our policy allows now for over 5 years. Jack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFOYbcm2Aqo=ZmXpydQq4U3G32RAZxDMDqDQtJT-kQBAyvhwkg>