Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:22:07 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps doesn't need privileges? Message-ID: <19990911132207.J906@holly.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <19990911174400.D3C911CAE@overcee.netplex.com.au> References: <19990911113104.H906@holly.dyndns.org> <19990911174400.D3C911CAE@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > Now that I think about it, it shouldn't be too hard (TM) to finish off the > /proc/pid/cmdline stuff so that ps didn't need to access /mem and didn't > need setgid at all. What about the `e' flag? -- |Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> |Computers... are not designed, as we are, for ambiguity. - Thomas `------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990911132207.J906>