Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:27:42 -0600 From: Steve Price <steve@havk.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Changing rsync to use SSH rather than RSH by default Message-ID: <20010226202742.M426@bsd.havk.org> In-Reply-To: <20010226160325.C2746@dragon.nuxi.com>; from TrimYourCc@NUXI.com on Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:03:25PM -0800 References: <200102260748.f1Q7me520862@freefall.freebsd.org> <86lmqt6ekc.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010226002530.A21297@hub.freebsd.org> <86k86d6cge.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010226160325.C2746@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:03:25PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > Akinori MUSHA-san has asked if I would be willing to change the default > remote transport from RSH to SSH. How do people feel about that? Of > course we have SSH in the base system, but not all other OSs do. The POLA-purists would probably say something like make it configurable via an environment variable like RSYNC_RSH and have it default to /usr/bin/rsh if not overridden in the user's environment. Also many people are probably using rsync on internal networks and don't need the security more than they need the speed of transfers. My $0.02 for what it's worth. -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010226202742.M426>