Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:21:14 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
To:        Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/117488: [patch] sysutils/screen enable installation of man page
Message-ID:  <200710261721.l9QHLETQ036379@cwsys.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> "of Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:05:59 %2B0200." <47221E77.6030305@gahr.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <47221E77.6030305@gahr.ch>, Pietro Cerutti writes: 
> See my last e-mail. It was my fault, I had NO_INFO in make.conf.
> However, in this situation, the port doesn't handle that directive
> properly. Instead of not installing the INFO page, it aborts the
> installation.

I consider this specific issue resolved.

As far as ports detecting if options have been set in make.conf, that is a 
larger issue than with just one port. The ports infrastructure relies on 
settings in make.conf that do not negatively interfere with the 
infrastructure or ports build process. Options address this issue though if 
a person wishes to set a variable in make.conf for an application outside 
of the ports infrastructure which could have a negative impact on a build, 
it is possible for ports to unset any possible make or environment variable 
that would be used during a build to avoid this situation.

I'm CCing this to FreeBSD-ports@ to generate some discussion about the 
issue in general and BCC to GNATS to maintain a record of this in the 
database.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

			e**(i*pi)+1=0





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710261721.l9QHLETQ036379>