Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Aug 2002 09:35:01 -0500
From:      D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com>
To:        security at FreeBSD <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Was "Um, 4.6-RELEASE-p19?", should be "4.5-RELEASE-p19?"
Message-ID:  <20020818093501.A26754@sheol.localdomain>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, I typo'ed the subject. I meant 4.5, not 4.6.

Dave

----- Forwarded message from D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> -----

Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 09:30:14 -0500
From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com>
To: security at FreeBSD <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject: Um, 4.6-RELEASE-p19?
Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

This I found in UPDATING, quite unintentionally:

    20020813:       p19
        Bounds checking errors in accept(), getsockname(),
        getpeername(), and a VESA ioctl() command were corrected.

It has no SA, nor was any notice sent. At five days, am I just being too
impatient for an advisory?

Dave

-- 
  ______________________                         ______________________
  \__________________   \    D. J. HAWKEY JR.   /   __________________/
     \________________/\     hawkeyd@visi.com    /\________________/
                      http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/


----- End forwarded message -----

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020818093501.A26754>