Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:51:01 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Subject: Re: md (file backed) performance [Was: Re: unionfs 5.4] Message-ID: <20050317025101.GO91771@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200503170303.12403@harrymail> References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <200503170222.07169@harrymail> <20050316202334.W20708@mail.chesapeake.net> <200503170303.12403@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:03:05AM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture
> > to properly function. I'll mail re@ to see what their opinion is for 5.5.
>
> Oic. I haven't tracked -current since christmas so I'd like to ask if you know
> anything new about file backed md performance.
> I wanted to use that for jail systems but performance was really bad.
> Does your great work also improve md behaviour?
A few months ago alc made some commits which improved md performance
significantly.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050317025101.GO91771>