Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:41:01 +0900 From: Svyatoslav Lempert <svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 Message-ID: <CAERaTk_4mWiBZO7Gp-TBA-ZsFmHT4YAL%2BwJBc6Lc3qpMbT%2B02w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1018A8F3-A4E6-468C-8097-E60349E121F5@gmail.com> References: <CAERaTk--Qb4ez2qYOjk51qws_2G0jcj4qZLGdeY-nZV1C3jjHA@mail.gmail.com> <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> <20120312093126.4420939f@scorpio> <4F5E0192.8000301@quip.cz> <1018A8F3-A4E6-468C-8097-E60349E121F5@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Anyway I think that the steps of launching a new port/port usage/port dep= recation is necessary for this exact reason. The other way would be to free= ze all the tree from time to time (i.e. several months) and ask projects ma= intainers/developers to stick to each freeze. FreeBSD system do that, but i= n userland it is imho not possible due to the big amount of ports available= , dependencies, conflicts, etc. > I think the best thing to actually do lang/php53 who need it. And to maintain it. Just need to make this port at one time with the update php5 to version 5.4 and is described in UPDATING --=20 Svyatoslav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAERaTk_4mWiBZO7Gp-TBA-ZsFmHT4YAL%2BwJBc6Lc3qpMbT%2B02w>