Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) From: craig@tuna.progroup.com (Craig W. Shaver) To: mark@vmunix.com (Mark Mayo) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD shines..[Fwd: Re: semaphore speed] Message-ID: <199711051442.GAA02406@ProGroup.COM> In-Reply-To: <19971105022925.47573@vmunix.com> from "Mark Mayo" at Nov 5, 97 02:29:25 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 12:03:09AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, John S. Dyson wrote: > > del .... > > Hmm. To verify, I just ran it on a PPro 150, 2.2-STABLE circa > Oct 1st: > fcntl: 13.9273 secs > ipc: 11.8795 secs 60mhz bus > > On a PPro 200, 2.2.5-STABLE from today: > fcntl: 10.9368 secs > ipc: 9.40272 secs 66mhz bus > > Now for the interesting part, a Pentium 166MMX: > fcntl: 9.64589 > ipc: 7.66043 66mhz bus > > Could it be a weird PPro thing? The only other difference in the > 166 kernel is that the FASTER_5X86_FPU (something like that) > is turned on. Oh yeah, the kernel is 2.2.5-STABLE from today as well. > > I'll see if I have an older machine/kernel around and try out some > more tests.. > > -Mark -- Craig Shaver (craig@progroup.com) (415)390-0654 Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA 94088
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711051442.GAA02406>