Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:43:25 +0200 From: Rainer Goellner <rainer@jabbe.de> To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AVM BlueFritz! Message-ID: <42DADF0D.4070509@jabbe.de> In-Reply-To: <42DAD3C5.9060800@savvis.net> References: <42DA013A.3050900@jabbe.de> <42DAD3C5.9060800@savvis.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > Rainer, > >> Why was the AVM BlueFritz! USB adapter put into the list >> of ignored devices? As Marcel Holtmann pointed out to me >> some time ago, at least version 2.0 is H:2 standard compliant, >> except that it doesn't tell us. I used it quite some time >> with a patch like kern/76205. > > > i guess its my fault. i misunderstood the purpose of the patch in the > pr. i was under impression that intention was to _prevent_ ng_ubt(4) > from attaching to the adapter, not _force_ it to attach. > Seems reasonable from your point of view. >> AFAIK earlier versions of the adapter are problematic. >> I don't know how to distinguish them, but to ignore all >> of them doesn't sound like a good idea to me. > > > i have a report which clearly states that AVM BlueFritz! usb adapter > does not work with ng_ubt(4). i also have a dump of all usb interfaces > and endpoints that does not look like H:2 standard compliant. i'm pretty > sure that at the time i saw special Linux driver for the device. i did > not port it because i did not have the device. > Sounds like a pre v2.0 BlueFritz!. I'm sure you know about this; anyway, it may be of some help: http://www.holtmann.org/linux/bluetooth/features.html > could you please obtain a dump from the device that shows all the > interfaces, endpoints, etc. and send it to me? perhaps there is way to > distinguish between working and non-working version of the adapter. > How do I get that dump? Probably you don't just mean those few dmesg lines, do you? ubt0: Bluetooth Device Bluetooth Device, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2 ubt0: Bluetooth Device Bluetooth Device, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2 ubt0: Interface 0 endpoints: interrupt=0x81, bulk-in=0x82, bulk-out=0x2 ubt0: Interface 1 (alt.config 5) endpoints: isoc-in=0x83, isoc-out=0x3; \ wMaxPacketSize=49; nframes=6, buffer size=294 > in the mean time i should probably revert my changes and force ng_ubt(4) > to attach to the adapter. > As an alternative, what would be a reasonable place to document the problem so that a user can find it? Thanks, Rainer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42DADF0D.4070509>