Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:07 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: hartzell@alerce.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Help with filing a [maybe] ZFS/mmap bug. Message-ID: <5289D357.9080007@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <21129.11769.292612.582677@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20967.760.95825.310085@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <51E80B30.1090004@FreeBSD.org> <20968.10645.880772.30501@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <520202E5.30300@FreeBSD.org> <20994.55913.93606.436124@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <FEE7BDCF7F494EE1BA0BE9424275AA91@multiplay.co.uk> <21111.12085.958991.356982@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4EB902F80CE84DD2BF36C85EF4CE8EF8@multiplay.co.uk> <5284B8A5.8040604@FreeBSD.org> <52889105.7040404@FreeBSD.org> <21129.11769.292612.582677@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 17/11/2013 22:58 George Hartzell said the following: > This fixes my "test case" (un-automated though it may be). I've > successfully run twice through using Picard (which uses Mutagen, which > uses mmap) on my 10-ALPHA-2 to tag and transcode a set of tracks that > used to consistently but nondeterministically result in failures. > > It's a bit of a negative result, all that I can see is that I seem to > no longer see the problem. But I'm happier than I was and your logic > seems to match the reality I was experiencing. Thank you very much for testing! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5289D357.9080007>