Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:04:46 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Shafia Kausar <s0k9955@unix.tamu.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, shafiak@ee.tamu.edu
Subject:   Re: Timer Granularity 
Message-ID:  <199810300504.VAA00773@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:54:08 CST." <Pine.SOL.3.96.981029224843.28687B-100000@fox.tamu.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> I am confused, On basis of which parameters is the kernel clock
> granularity defined?? especially when multiple clocks are available.

At which release level?  2.1.x, 2.2.x or 3.x?

As a general rule, the best available clock is used.  The techniques 
used to determine which clock is best, and to ensure accurate counts 
vary from release to release, with a general trend towards better.

> 
> On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Mike Smith wrote:
> 
> > > I am new to the FreeBSD OS. I have a few questions for which I could not
> > > find answers on the webpages.
> > > 
> > > I am using the FreeBSD version 2.1.5 Relase #2. What is the kernel clock
> > > granularity in this version?
> > 
> > 10ms, if I remember correctly.
> 
> > 
> > > There are a number of clocks being used in FreeBSD. Which clock is used
> > > for real time kernel processing? Is this accessible to the users?
> > 
> > No clocks are "accessible to the users".  User applications obtain time 
> > values from the system.
> > 
> > > Has the timer granularity improved in the releases following this release?
> > 
> > Yes.  Timer support now offers nanosecond resolution, dependant on the 
> > particular clock source(s) in use.
> > 
> > > In the /sys/kern/kern_clock.c file the variable time_precision has been
> > > initialised to 1microsec, but it has been stated that the resolution
> > > decreases depending on whether the external clock is working or not. 
> > > What is the range of the variation in the resolutuion? 
> > 
> > It depends on the hardware in use.  On some systems the Pentium TSC is 
> > available as a time source, in which case time resolution is one CPU 
> > cycle.  The i8254 timecounter generally has an operating frequency 
> > around 1.19MHz, giving a resolution of approximately 1us.
> > 
> > -- 
> > \\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
> > \\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
> > \\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
> > \\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810300504.VAA00773>