Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:21:36 -0500 (EST)
From:      Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>
To:        Leif Neland <leif@neland.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why not a default number of pings?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001181520290.15785-100000@sapphire.looksharp.net>
In-Reply-To: <01dd01bf6145$e13d6c80$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think the -a parameter to ping would be useful to you.  It makes the pc
speaker emit a beep for every reply.  If you have the speaker working and
are not hearing impaired, you will NOT forget! :)

On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Leif Neland wrote:

> I've been hit by a "forgotten ping" again.
> 
> I still do not see a reason for not having a default number of pings, instead of infinite.
> The only reason I've seen is "It's always been so".
> 
> Even if a default of 4 pings is not acceptable, because windows does it that way, why not a large default then?
> 
> If somebody _really_ want to ping forever, let them use -t0, and defend the rest of us from our blunders of forgetting a ping, keeping the line open infinitely.
> 
> How about a MAX_PING=3600 in make.conf or so?
> 
> I've supplied patches earlier, but they've been rejected.
> 
> Leif
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001181520290.15785-100000>